The times when you used to tell people what you want and force your customs, your religion, and everything that serves your interests are over. As Muslims, our constitution is the Qur'an, and it is sufficient justice for us. No matter how much you lie about the reality, spend vast amounts of money, and kill or imprison anyone who speaks the truth, we will never abandon our religion. Call us whatever bad name you wish call us terrorists or whatever you want—God is one, He created this world, and He is sufficient for us.
You didn't even understand what he wrote! The 'cancel culture' in Jihadist Groups represents a concrete and empirically evident reality, beacause aside from what he wrote, they use it as an instrument of indoctrination and recruitment. When one’s identity is erased, their sense of belonging is inevitably lost, and it is precisely at that point that they seek out their most vulnerable adherents, whom they often exploit as test subjects.
The general idea I gathered from reading the text is sufficient for me: the Western nations are the ones who attacked and destroyed Muslim countries—Iraq, Syria, Libya, Afghanistan, Somalia, and Palestine. They are the ones who supply the funding and weapons that the Jews use to massacre the innocent people of Palestine. Can you tell me of a single Christian country that the US and the West have invaded? There is none, because they share the same religion and the same goal. I am certain that you will not like this writing that I am sending you now, because it is a painful truth, and you might call me a terrorist, since that is the name you give everyone who opposes your agenda. But know one thing: God protects this religion, and no one can change it.
There is no inherent link between Western colonialism—whether historical or socio-economic—and Islam. Many of the regions affected by colonial expansion, such as South America, India, and large parts of sub-Saharan Africa, are not Muslim-majority societies. For this reason, introducing Islam into the discussion does not logically follow from the premise.
Moreover, the article in question focuses specifically on Jihadist groups dynamics: mechanisms of identity manipulation, throw cancel culture. It doesn't address colonialism or neo-colonialism, it doesn't discuss the Palestinian issue, and it doesn't examine religious conflicts. Therefore, providing a “general idea” that mixes all of these unrelated themes in this context results in a conceptual mismatch and obscures the actual subject of the article. In other words, you cannot respond to an article that deals with one precise topic by creating a broad and unfocused synthesis that conflates multiple, unrelated issues. Doing so produces a nonsensical combination of arguments that do not correspond to the content being discussed.
The times when you used to tell people what you want and force your customs, your religion, and everything that serves your interests are over. As Muslims, our constitution is the Qur'an, and it is sufficient justice for us. No matter how much you lie about the reality, spend vast amounts of money, and kill or imprison anyone who speaks the truth, we will never abandon our religion. Call us whatever bad name you wish call us terrorists or whatever you want—God is one, He created this world, and He is sufficient for us.
You didn't even understand what he wrote! The 'cancel culture' in Jihadist Groups represents a concrete and empirically evident reality, beacause aside from what he wrote, they use it as an instrument of indoctrination and recruitment. When one’s identity is erased, their sense of belonging is inevitably lost, and it is precisely at that point that they seek out their most vulnerable adherents, whom they often exploit as test subjects.
The general idea I gathered from reading the text is sufficient for me: the Western nations are the ones who attacked and destroyed Muslim countries—Iraq, Syria, Libya, Afghanistan, Somalia, and Palestine. They are the ones who supply the funding and weapons that the Jews use to massacre the innocent people of Palestine. Can you tell me of a single Christian country that the US and the West have invaded? There is none, because they share the same religion and the same goal. I am certain that you will not like this writing that I am sending you now, because it is a painful truth, and you might call me a terrorist, since that is the name you give everyone who opposes your agenda. But know one thing: God protects this religion, and no one can change it.
It is clear that you have not understood the meaning of the analysis.
Furthermore, your rhetoric is outdated, redundant and superficial.
There is no inherent link between Western colonialism—whether historical or socio-economic—and Islam. Many of the regions affected by colonial expansion, such as South America, India, and large parts of sub-Saharan Africa, are not Muslim-majority societies. For this reason, introducing Islam into the discussion does not logically follow from the premise.
Moreover, the article in question focuses specifically on Jihadist groups dynamics: mechanisms of identity manipulation, throw cancel culture. It doesn't address colonialism or neo-colonialism, it doesn't discuss the Palestinian issue, and it doesn't examine religious conflicts. Therefore, providing a “general idea” that mixes all of these unrelated themes in this context results in a conceptual mismatch and obscures the actual subject of the article. In other words, you cannot respond to an article that deals with one precise topic by creating a broad and unfocused synthesis that conflates multiple, unrelated issues. Doing so produces a nonsensical combination of arguments that do not correspond to the content being discussed.
It is clear that you have not read the analysis.